{"id":27,"date":"2006-10-05T15:09:05","date_gmt":"2006-10-05T15:09:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2006-appropriateness\/"},"modified":"2018-04-23T16:16:59","modified_gmt":"2018-04-23T16:16:59","slug":"2006-appropriateness","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/","title":{"rendered":"20.06 Appropriateness  (p.16)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">hard cover page 16<\/div>\n<p>Is the whole question of a theodicy appropriate? Immanuel Kant pointed out that if it is arrogant to defend God, it is even more arrogant to assail Him.<sup>46<\/sup> Yet the Jew in particular, and religious man of reason in general, has always grappled with cosmic whys and wherefores. It is in part this grappling for authenticity which distinguishes religious man of reason from religious fanatic man, (moved by intense uncritical devotion) who is untroubled by reason.<\/p>\n<p><!--COPY THIS ENTIRE CODE TO START TABLE--><\/p>\n<hr align=\"left\" width=\"80%\" size=\"1\" \/>\n<table>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\">CONVERSION TABLE for this multi-page\u00c2 unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"3\"><strong>you are currently on hard cover p. 16<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 125px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2005-defining-parameters\/2\/\">< BACK<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50px\">\u00c2 <\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/summametaphysica.com\/ge\/3000-theodicy-in-the-jewish-tradition\/\">NEXT PAGE><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 125px\" valign=\"bottom\"><strong>Pages pointer<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50px\">\u00c2 <\/td>\n<td valign=\"bottom\"><strong>hard cover page<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 125px\" valign=\"top\" align=\"left\">1<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50px\" valign=\"top\" align=\"left\">><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" align=\"left\">16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><!--END OF TABLE--><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>hard cover page 16 Is the whole question of a theodicy appropriate? Immanuel Kant pointed out that if it is arrogant to defend God, it is even more arrogant to assail Him.46 Yet the Jew in particular, and religious man of reason in general, has always grappled with cosmic whys and wherefores. It is in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":21,"menu_order":105,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v18.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"next\" href=\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"hard cover page 16 Is the whole question of a theodicy appropriate? Immanuel Kant pointed out that if it is arrogant to defend God, it is even more arrogant to assail Him.46 Yet the Jew in particular, and religious man of reason in general, has always grappled with cosmic whys and wherefores. It is in [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-23T16:16:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/\",\"name\":\"David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/\",\"name\":\"20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-10-05T15:09:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-23T16:16:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"20.00 THEODICY IN FOCUS (pps.9-16)\"}]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/","next":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I","og_description":"hard cover page 16 Is the whole question of a theodicy appropriate? Immanuel Kant pointed out that if it is arrogant to defend God, it is even more arrogant to assail Him.46 Yet the Jew in particular, and religious man of reason in general, has always grappled with cosmic whys and wherefores. It is in [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/","og_site_name":"David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I","article_modified_time":"2018-04-23T16:16:59+00:00","twitter_card":"summary","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/","name":"David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/","name":"20.06 Appropriateness (p.16) - David Birnbaum Summa Metaphysica I","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-10-05T15:09:05+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-23T16:16:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/2000-theodicy-in-focus\/2006-appropriateness\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"20.00 THEODICY IN FOCUS (pps.9-16)"}]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/27"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/27\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":201,"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/27\/revisions\/201"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.summametaphysica.com\/ge\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}